Sweet 16. :>

I am the left brain. I am a scientist. A mathematician. I love the familiar. I categorize. I am accurate. Linear. Analytical. Strategic. I am practical. Always in control. A master of words and language. Realistic. I calculate equations and play with numbers. I am order. I am logic. I know exactly who I am.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Infusing Computers into Cells: “Playing God”?


            
Now that we have successfully put a name to what our ancestors called ‘magic’, the world, with all its knowledge and expertise, is expanding in the blink of an eye under the cover of ‘science’. The question is, does our ability to pursue humanity’s never-ending quest to unveil the mysteries of the world already overstepping our bounds as ‘creations,” not “creators”? Religious conservatives have put it succinctly in the phrase: “playing God”. But is humankind truly playing god?

The phrase "playing God" is not a theological term; rather, it derives from secular culture and functions as a warning, an accusation if you will, to people, particularly scholars, who “substitute” themselves for God through the idolization of science resulting in moral injunctions against their pursuit of total and unrestrained control over nature. But the truth is, the term has been used to describe even a mundane activity as “doing anything or making any decision that places anyone else's life in your hands, or making judgments about someone that can [a]ffect them”. However, I do believe that it’s all a matter of perspective, and scientists are no closer in finding the secret ingredients to Creation than in measuring the distance between heaven and earth.

 

A blunt assessment of the Holy Bible describes the one true God as loving, patient, and omniscient; thus, I believe that He would never want to stand in the way of the advancement of His people. The revelation of natural wonders, by scientists no less, has never signified that humans are on the threshold of acquiring God-like powers, especially in matters of life and death. In fact, couldn’t it be argued that the process is only feasible with the utilization of the gift of intelligence from God? Aren’t we His workers, disciples, if you may, planted here on earth to make the world a better place? Human abilities are merely mirrors of God’s power; our own strength can never equal His for ours is limited in nature, not because we are not like God but because He is not one of us.

 

When the media talks about the risks of scientists playing God, with genetic engineering and creating hybrids and other strange life forms in the laboratory, we tend to think about so-called Frankenstein foods and the risk posed by our interfering with the natural order. However, while Western critics fuss about the morality of stem-cell research and genetic engineering, Asian religions champion biotechnology as “[t]herapeutic cloning in particular [that] jibes well with the Buddhist and Hindu ideas of reincarnation.”

In 2010, genome-mapping pioneer J. Craig Venter has successfully created artificial life in a laboratory for the first time, sparking debate about his “playing god” and the potential dangers of his invention. Professor Julian Savulescu, an expert in Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford, said: “Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity’s history, potentially peeking into its destiny. He is going toward the role of a god: creating artificial life that could never have existed naturally.”

For many of us, this is not a problem. But some will see the discovery as usurping the proper role of God, or taking an arrogant and hubristic attitude to life. “They are not just tinkering with life, they are designing and creating it.”

 

However, Dr. Venter only dismissed these allegations, saying: ''That's [playing god] a term that comes up every time there is a new medical or scientific breakthrough associated with biology. It's been a goal of humanity from the earlier stages to try and control nature…that's how we got domesticated animals.”

Like Prometheus, scientists are said to be overstepping finite limits; out of pride or hubris they are risking a backlash from nature.  But our era is limited only by our imagination. Anything is possible but not everything can be deemed as truly the work of a god, not even by a human-god. To breathe life into a bacterium using genes assembled in the laboratory is not similar to giving life to a human being out of thin air. Scientists may try to prove themselves capable of ‘playing god’ but there is more to creating life than meets the eye. The key is to approach science with a grain of caution and with an eye open for an infinite number of possibilities. To appreciate science is to appreciate the One who created it. 

REFERENCES:

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad GMO?


The subject of genetically-modified organisms (GMO) receives so little publicity in the sphere of public debate. This very reason is to blame for the “massive and uncontrolled unleashing of GMOs into our diets and our environment”. However, the general public is in desperate need of enlightenment about a topic as crucial to one’s survival as food.

Since 2002, the arrival of GMOs such as the Bt corn and the Bt eggplant in the Philippine market has stirred contention among environment groups and independent scientists against the flawed GMO approval system in the country, which as of 2001, has approved a “total of 67 GMOs for importation, consumption, and/or propagation”, even for varieties banned in other countries.

In 1974, Henry Kissinger stated, “He who controls the food, controls the people” and nowhere is this more apparent than in the realm of GMOs and the multinational monopolies that control them. George Siemon, CEO of Organic Valley, the United States’ largest organic farming cooperative put it succinctly in an article from ABC news: “There is a growing awareness that our [food supply] system makes us all guinea pigs of sorts.” The fact that most of us don’t know these sad realities—or worse, don’t even know that we have the right to lay our questions down—is a damning indication of how the GMO debate is being stifled and concealed from public eyes.  The side of GMO multinationals and promoters would rather kill the debate than leave themselves vulnerable to controversies they themselves cannot fully account for. In other words, the less people know about GMOs, the less the opposition. With no other choice but defense, this side brands the opposition as “anti-technology”, “primitive”, even “inefficient”, in an attempt to deflect attention from the fact that there is truth to the grave scientific uncertainties on the safety of GMOs.
Without even a pretense to solid scrutiny, it is no wonder if there is truly a dark hidden agenda to manipulate science, public governance and public perception for the benefit of profit-maximizing goals rather than public good. However, time will expose those who have been in the pursuit of truth after all. But in the meantime, media should be at the forefront of this expose, leaving no stone unturned. The public has the right to be distrustful and they have every right to, because the GMOs are no laughing matter.
References: